Looking for:
Recommended tenderer/streamer - Streamers - Audirvana. |
- bluesound node 2 - Mac Installation - Audirvana
Audirvana bluesound free. Bluesound Node Review (Streamer)
- Audiogon Discussion Forum
Use the app from any device, no messing around with drivers, plug and play. From the ease of use you will be up to Roon. Any other software is for geeks. This is the sad summary at this point…if it turns out that my very much appreciated NOVA dac is not 96Khz capable I have reached for the Peachtree Audio team I will have to decide how to move forward….
This is good as it would be a step up in sound quality as long as I buy a good enough DAC. Option c will probably have to wait for sometime. I still think streaming is a wonder, but the digital world can be stressing. Wait for them to confirm. There is another option, if you are a little bit in diy.
You could get a raspberry pi4 and install GentooPlayer or moOde or Volumio all free software. Audirvana will find the raspberry over the network without any issue. The Audirvana had a much larger soundstage with noticeably more air and deeper bass.
I preferred it on most tracks. Vocals sounded more natural at times. I tried the Node with other connections. This was using basic cables The coaxial sounded similar to USB, just with less top end. The optical out sounded great and had a lot of rhythm to it Hope this helps. Obviously all these differences are very system dependent.
At the very least it puts an end to the myth that a dedicated streamer is always better than a laptop playback. Nice write up on each. I differ from you however in that I would hate to have to get up every time I want to hear something different! Thanks - I rely on forums a lot, and am trying to better about sharing information so it can be helpful to others. You'll definitely pay for the privilege — it's the most expensive streamer in our list, far more so than the Naim Uniti Atom.
But the Selekt DSM manages to hold its own, offering an excellent range features. We also adore the sound quality. There's no amplifier, although you do have the option to upgrade to one if you choose to. The audio quality from the internal circuitry is lively and dynamic, and great fun to listen to. But here's the catch. Yes, you get Ethernet, and Wi-Fi compatibility is being added on at a later date As good as this streamer is, you may want to wait a while before investing your hard earned dollars.
The Bryston BDA Bryston products have always put sound quality overlooks, and while the BDA It matches up well with other similarly priced streamers like the Auralic Aries G2. The BDA These are useful if you plan to make this stream are the hub of your home entertainment system and TV sound.
Bryston say they are planning to correct this with a future update, but at this price point, it feels like something rushed to market a little too fast. The BDA 3. See the Bryston BDA What We Don't: Sound is a little dull.
Then again, the DS-AG is a solid entry to the market. It looks superb, with its offset display and industrial aesthetic, and we appreciate the range of features. The audio quality is fine, but unexciting, and we kept wishing for more liveliness — especially in the bass.
This is doubly surprising given how competent the app is, and the room calibration settings it offers. How do we explain the Chord 2Go? Because it does take some explaining. Got that? Do you see what we mean when we say this is weirdly specific? We also really appreciate the auto switching function for inputs.
You never need to manually change your input — just press play on your chosen source. The clever design makes the 2Go a winner, although there are definitely better options available for most people. See the Chord Electronics 2Go. For starters, you probably already have a music streamer.
You may even be reading this article on it. Your smartphone actually qualifies as a music streamer. It is capable of taking audio files stored in another location, like a music streaming service, and playing them.
It won't necessarily do a brilliant job — its internal circuitry, like its Digital-to-Analog Converter DAC , probably cost less than a dollar to manufacture - but by the strictest standards of what qualifies as a music streamer, it is one. Think about that for a second. Think of how useful it is to be able to retrieve music this way, without necessarily having to rely on physical media.
If you are serious about your music, then you want this retrieval to be as seamless as possible. You want to extract the maximum amount of information from that audio file, no matter where it is located. You don't want there to be any weak links in your audio chain, which means thinking about how you actually retrieve your music. A dedicated music streamer is the answer here: a single-box solution that can make sure your music is delivered in the purest possible way.
In many cases, you don't even have to put down your phone to use them: almost all of the options on our list above come with a control app, which makes selecting and playing music a breeze. And if you don't believe us, if you think this kind of audio product is a total waste of money, then we have a suggestion for you. We guarantee you'll be wanting something a little bit more intense before long — and once you're sucked in, you won't believe just how rewarding music streamers can be.
You'll see the term thrown around a lot in the world of music streaming and high-end audio, so it's worth taking a minute or two to understand the difference between a DAC and a music streamer. A DAC's job is to convert a digital music file into an analog signal ; to take the 1s and 0s that make up a file, and convert them into an electrical impulse that the human ear can actually pick up.
What it does not do is actually retrieve music from anywhere. It will take any file you feed it, and convert it into an audible signal, but it will not actually go and hunt down its own food. That's what a music streamer is for. The confusion comes because of the fact that many music streamers have DACs included in them, meaning they can both retrieve and convert audio. It has the ability to both stream music and to convert it to an analog signal - something it shares with many of the streamers on our list.
It pushes this signal through a set of analog outputs, meaning you can connect it directly to an amplifier or a set of powered speakers. But — and this is the clever part — it also contains digital outputs, meaning you can bypass its DAC entirely. You'd do this if you have a DAC already, one you are comfortable with and wish to continue to use. Essentially, what you need to understand is that a streamer and a DAC are two separate things, but it is entirely possible for them to both be contained in the same box.
By the way, you will sometimes see companies marketing their products as streaming DACs. They do this because they like confusing people. We kid: it's because they wish to market their product as a DAC, first and foremost, only one that has streaming capabilities. For all intents and purposes, you can consider these music streamers. But if we are talking streaming audio, then our wish would be for companies to agree, once and for all, on the terms they are going to use.
Nothing is more confusing than stumbling across the term network player, and wondering if it means the same thing as music streamer, or if it's something different, and whether or not a music server will actually stream music. So let's demystify this, once and for all. The key thing to bear in mind is that music streamers and network players are exactly the same thing.
There is literally no difference. The terms can be used interchangeably. You'll also sometimes see them called things like network media players, media streamers, and delightful whizbang machines one of those is made up. That location can be a Spotify playlist, a hard drive, a USB stick, anything - as long as it's not actually contained in the housing of the music streamer itself.
Our top music streamer, if you haven't read yet, is the stupendous — and stupendously expensive — Naim Uniti Atom. A music server is slightly different. Doesn't that depend on the OS you run on the RPi? Joined Nov 23, Messages 50 Likes Well guys, I did try the Rpi "thingy".
I set it up according to various video tutorials, it cost me EUR in parts and a lot of hours to put it together, install raspbian and raspotify to be able to stream from 1 streaming service only. It worked just fine while it worked but the RPi was often disconnecting from my home wifi so I decided to buy powerline adapters another 50 EUR cost to connect it to the internet via ethernet cable.
Again, it worked wonderfully while it worked but then it stopped working properly in a manner of weeks. I have an external DAC connected to it via coax. The connection stability is good even via wifi, the app works and I can stream from multiple streaming services while my Rpi gadget could only do Spotify Connect.
While the value for money might not be perfect the device works just fine as a network streamer. I have easily dumped like USD worth of time and money into my Rpi streamer and then I had to replace it anyway. Last edited: Aug 26, Volumio's Primo for about the cost of the BlueSound Node is a much higher performing and better designed unit, with a far better DAC chip. As to the Node, they could do a much better job for little or no additional cost. Why don't they? I would submit that the lion's share of Node buyers are quite content if not extremely happy with the sound and the product.
A lot of their music might even be stored in compressed formats to begin with, or listened to over not particularly accurate of systems. Laserjock said:. The biggest downsides of Cambridge streamer for me are zero DAC capabilities and quite a steep price. Joined Jan 7, Messages Likes If you are going to resort to upnp then just use bubbleupnp for free? I used to use mconnect when I had a bluesound vault 2. It was ok from memory. I will not be changing from Roon anytime soon though….
I guess the answer is to keep my head down and suck it up. I start a track in the Audirvana app then find another app to stop it No real loss , Roon covers my audio needs, JRiver my video. I use AS much more now than Roon for a number of reasons: No need to dedicate a computer to it and have it on the whole time. Better SQ to my ears, clearly.
Booklets are seamlessly integrated. Dirac-Live integration.
No comments:
Post a Comment